Family role vital for mental health of young: Study
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: A study has found that strong family support is a critical factor associated with low prevalence of mental disorders among adolescents. Similarly, factors that indicate adoption of a non-traditional lifestyle are associated with increased prevalence of mental disorders among youngsters.
Called “Non-traditional lifestyles and prevalence of mental disorders in adolescents in Goa”, the study was conducted by NGO Sangath and published recently in the British Journal of Psychiatry.
While there is an independent association of mental disorders with an outgoing ‘non-traditional’ lifestyle (frequent partying, going to the cinema, shopping for fun and having a boyfriend or girlfriend), difficulties with studies, lack of safety in the neighbourhood, a history of physical or verbal abuse and tobacco use, having one’s family as the primary source of social support was associated with lower prevalence of mental disorders, revealed the study.
Its results showed that the most common diagnoses were anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, behavioural disorders and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders. It also noted that adolescents from urban areas and girls who faced gender discrimination had a higher prevalence of mental disorders. Similarly, physical or verbal abuse from parents or other family members and peers were independently associated with mental disorders.
Most of the adolescents — 75% — in the study spoke Konkani at homeme and lived with both parents (83.6%). A small proportion (3.7%) livedwith neither parent. Majority (91.6%) were full-time students at the time of the interview, 7.9% had dropped out of school and 0.5% had never had any formal education. Overall, 39.4% of adolescents reported experiencing difficulties with their studies. A total of 157 adolescents reported having worked for pay and among these 53.2% started working before the age of 14.
Sangath conducted the epidemiological study to describe the current prevalence of mental disorders and its correlates among 2,000 plus adolescents aged between 12 and 16 years.
The aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence and correlates of mental disorders in adolescents. For the same, a population-based survey of all eligible adolescents from six urban wards and four rural communities was randomly selected to diagnose current emotional and behavioural disorders. All adolescents were also interviewed
on socio-economic factors, education, neighbourhood, parental relations, peer and sexual relationships, violence and substance abuse.
The sample for the study was enumerated through two sources: the family registers maintained by the health centres and eligible adolescents residing in the area who were identified during the door-to-door survey.
While in the rural areas,most adolescents were identified from the family health register, in the urban areas, the family registers maintained by the health centre had not been updated for several years and thus they carried out a door-to-door survey to enumerate the adolescents.
January 10, 2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Saturday, January 10, 2009
Goa-More cops for netas than coast
More cops for netas than coast
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: There are 74 policemen manning the sandy stretch from Majorda to Mobor at Colva police station. The number of police personnel posted at the sensitive Calangute and Anjuna police stations are 85 and 77 respectively. The number of police personnel guarding the state’s 12 ministers, speaker and deputy speaker touches 164, much more than the number of policemen posted at any single police station in Goa.
Policemen handling the district Police Control Rooms in North and South Goa are 13 and 14 respectively, just above the number of men—12 — guarding home minister Ravi Naik. There are 37 cops manning the state PCR, which is still lower than the number of policemen protecting CM Digambar Kamat.
Goa’s CM and speaker have more police security than the state’s three coastal police stations. While the CM has 38 policemen guarding him, speaker Pratapsingh Rane is guarded by 33 policemen. Incidentally, the number of policemen manning the coastline from Benaulim to Pollem at the Mobor coastal police station is 22, lower than the number of policemen — 23 — guarding health minister Vishwajit Rane.
In other words, the police strength at sensitive police stations in Calangute (85), Anjuna (77), Pernem (82), Colva (74) and Canacona (64), all popular destinations with Israeli, British and American tourists or at the PCR or coastal police stations, important after the Mumbai attacks, is less compared to that given to ministers, former ministers and even parliamentary secretaries. Strength at police stations is just on paper, says ex-SP
Panaji: There are more policemen guarding the politicians in the state than the number of those manning the sensitive stretches of Goa coastal areas.
“The strength at police stations is just on paper. Many policemen from police stations are deployed at other places, including the houses of ruling party leaders. In the last few years it has become a trend amongst politicians, especially from the ruling party, to demand more security personnel than they are entitled to or require,” said former SP Alex Rasquinha.
Incidentally, while most police stations still have vintage .303 rifles, policemen guarding the homes of ministers are armed with 7.62 SLRs.
While the CM has a pilot vehicle and an escort vehicle with men armed with 9mm carbines and pistols or revolvers, the speaker has a flying squad and escort vehicle with policemen armed with pistols and 9mm carbines. The speaker’s son, who is the health minister has two escort vehicles and men armed with pistols and carbines. All ministers have two personal security officers, besides a sentry to guard their home, consisting of one hawaldar and four police constables. Even as politicians in the state continue to ask for, and get, security cover although they face no security threat, the ratio of police to population in the state in July 2008 was 1:339.
“Here security cover is not a matter of threat perception, but of prestige. The more security men you have, the more powerful you appear before the public. Mere cabinet status does not entitle anyone to security and there has to be a genuine threat perception,” said a top police official.
Former ministers Luizinho Faleiro, Wilfred de Souza and Francisco Sardinha (even before he became an MP) continued with their personal security officers long after they ceased to be ministers. MLAs Agnelo Fernandes, Francis Silveira, Nilkanth Halarnkar have managed to get personal security officers. Only education minister Atanasio Monserrate doesn’t have police protection. Incidentally, though the security review panel of the Goa police examines threat perception to politicians with the help of the Intelligence Bureau, most polticians manage to get protection merely on the strength of their political clout and influence.
January 9, 2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: There are 74 policemen manning the sandy stretch from Majorda to Mobor at Colva police station. The number of police personnel posted at the sensitive Calangute and Anjuna police stations are 85 and 77 respectively. The number of police personnel guarding the state’s 12 ministers, speaker and deputy speaker touches 164, much more than the number of policemen posted at any single police station in Goa.
Policemen handling the district Police Control Rooms in North and South Goa are 13 and 14 respectively, just above the number of men—12 — guarding home minister Ravi Naik. There are 37 cops manning the state PCR, which is still lower than the number of policemen protecting CM Digambar Kamat.
Goa’s CM and speaker have more police security than the state’s three coastal police stations. While the CM has 38 policemen guarding him, speaker Pratapsingh Rane is guarded by 33 policemen. Incidentally, the number of policemen manning the coastline from Benaulim to Pollem at the Mobor coastal police station is 22, lower than the number of policemen — 23 — guarding health minister Vishwajit Rane.
In other words, the police strength at sensitive police stations in Calangute (85), Anjuna (77), Pernem (82), Colva (74) and Canacona (64), all popular destinations with Israeli, British and American tourists or at the PCR or coastal police stations, important after the Mumbai attacks, is less compared to that given to ministers, former ministers and even parliamentary secretaries. Strength at police stations is just on paper, says ex-SP
Panaji: There are more policemen guarding the politicians in the state than the number of those manning the sensitive stretches of Goa coastal areas.
“The strength at police stations is just on paper. Many policemen from police stations are deployed at other places, including the houses of ruling party leaders. In the last few years it has become a trend amongst politicians, especially from the ruling party, to demand more security personnel than they are entitled to or require,” said former SP Alex Rasquinha.
Incidentally, while most police stations still have vintage .303 rifles, policemen guarding the homes of ministers are armed with 7.62 SLRs.
While the CM has a pilot vehicle and an escort vehicle with men armed with 9mm carbines and pistols or revolvers, the speaker has a flying squad and escort vehicle with policemen armed with pistols and 9mm carbines. The speaker’s son, who is the health minister has two escort vehicles and men armed with pistols and carbines. All ministers have two personal security officers, besides a sentry to guard their home, consisting of one hawaldar and four police constables. Even as politicians in the state continue to ask for, and get, security cover although they face no security threat, the ratio of police to population in the state in July 2008 was 1:339.
“Here security cover is not a matter of threat perception, but of prestige. The more security men you have, the more powerful you appear before the public. Mere cabinet status does not entitle anyone to security and there has to be a genuine threat perception,” said a top police official.
Former ministers Luizinho Faleiro, Wilfred de Souza and Francisco Sardinha (even before he became an MP) continued with their personal security officers long after they ceased to be ministers. MLAs Agnelo Fernandes, Francis Silveira, Nilkanth Halarnkar have managed to get personal security officers. Only education minister Atanasio Monserrate doesn’t have police protection. Incidentally, though the security review panel of the Goa police examines threat perception to politicians with the help of the Intelligence Bureau, most polticians manage to get protection merely on the strength of their political clout and influence.
January 9, 2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Britons seek help from commission
Britons seek help from commission
Foreigners In Goa Unnerved By ED Action, Fear Eviction
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: The two British nationals, against whom the Mumbai enforcement directorate (ED) acted for “illegally” purchasing property in Goa, have written to the British high commission for help. The ED action has unnerved other foreigners who fear confiscation of their home or even eviction.
“For the last six months we have been worried about our home being confiscated and us being rendered homeless and bankrupt. We are living a nightmare and the situation is mentally destructive, nerve wrecking and emotionally disturbing,” said 53-year-old British national Jean (name changed), who was issued summons by the ED to present her home registration documents.
Jean bought a 162 sq m apartment in Arpora in 2002 after selling her UK property and “after fulfilling all requirements under law to purchase property in India”.
Another Dutch national, who purchased an apartment in Kevim in 2004, is still awaiting clearance from the investigators. “The impression we get is that the Goa government may like to have us as tourists but not as residents. If that’s the case then I am willing to sell off my property in Goa and I promise never to return here. But it would be wrong to snatch everything away from us when we have spent money on lawyers and paper work to ensure that everything is done legally.”
The Dutch national says she spent time researching local property laws and talking to people who had already bought in Goa. “We have always tried to do what is legal. If our house is snatched and we are wrongfully fined for illegalities we never committed, then we will be literally in the gutter,” she added. They are on a five year X visa.
Meanwhile, the two British nationals — Nicholas Joseph Papa and his friend Michael Denis Cooper — who have a house in Corona, North Goa, have written to the British high commission, Mumbai, seeking intervention and help. “We feel that our government should investigate and intervene to help us as we have not done anything illegal. They should take up the matter with the Indian government as we wouldn’t be investing our life’s savings in something that is illegal,” said Papa.
Papa said that they were on a business visa when they purchased their first house on May 25, 2001, after a stay of 231 days, which they later sold. “We purchased the second house in September 2006 when we were on a five year X visa (permission to reside in a country without employment or business for a longer period) after staying in the country for 339 days. We never purchased property while on a tourist visa,” said Cooper.
Incidentally, even though North Goa additional collector in his letter to the ED on September 23 said that “unless a conversion sanad is obtained, the property continues to be agricultural though it falls under ‘R-zone/settlement zone’ as per zoning under the town and country planning department,” the fact remains that several sale deeds were done by sub-registrars and foreigners were given house number, house tax and provided electricity.
Advocate Vikram Varma dealing with cases of foreigners who have invested in property in Goa said, “The government has misinterpreted the provisions of FEMA. I have examined the documents and find no violation of FEMA in letter or spirit.”
Joint secretary of the state government Anupam Kishore said, “There has been no misinterpretation of FEMA and action has been initiated against foreign nationals who have contravened FEMA regulations. They also have a right to defend themselves. Most of them have given an affidavit before sub-registrars’ that they were residents in India, which was false.”
January 8, 2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Foreigners In Goa Unnerved By ED Action, Fear Eviction
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: The two British nationals, against whom the Mumbai enforcement directorate (ED) acted for “illegally” purchasing property in Goa, have written to the British high commission for help. The ED action has unnerved other foreigners who fear confiscation of their home or even eviction.
“For the last six months we have been worried about our home being confiscated and us being rendered homeless and bankrupt. We are living a nightmare and the situation is mentally destructive, nerve wrecking and emotionally disturbing,” said 53-year-old British national Jean (name changed), who was issued summons by the ED to present her home registration documents.
Jean bought a 162 sq m apartment in Arpora in 2002 after selling her UK property and “after fulfilling all requirements under law to purchase property in India”.
Another Dutch national, who purchased an apartment in Kevim in 2004, is still awaiting clearance from the investigators. “The impression we get is that the Goa government may like to have us as tourists but not as residents. If that’s the case then I am willing to sell off my property in Goa and I promise never to return here. But it would be wrong to snatch everything away from us when we have spent money on lawyers and paper work to ensure that everything is done legally.”
The Dutch national says she spent time researching local property laws and talking to people who had already bought in Goa. “We have always tried to do what is legal. If our house is snatched and we are wrongfully fined for illegalities we never committed, then we will be literally in the gutter,” she added. They are on a five year X visa.
Meanwhile, the two British nationals — Nicholas Joseph Papa and his friend Michael Denis Cooper — who have a house in Corona, North Goa, have written to the British high commission, Mumbai, seeking intervention and help. “We feel that our government should investigate and intervene to help us as we have not done anything illegal. They should take up the matter with the Indian government as we wouldn’t be investing our life’s savings in something that is illegal,” said Papa.
Papa said that they were on a business visa when they purchased their first house on May 25, 2001, after a stay of 231 days, which they later sold. “We purchased the second house in September 2006 when we were on a five year X visa (permission to reside in a country without employment or business for a longer period) after staying in the country for 339 days. We never purchased property while on a tourist visa,” said Cooper.
Incidentally, even though North Goa additional collector in his letter to the ED on September 23 said that “unless a conversion sanad is obtained, the property continues to be agricultural though it falls under ‘R-zone/settlement zone’ as per zoning under the town and country planning department,” the fact remains that several sale deeds were done by sub-registrars and foreigners were given house number, house tax and provided electricity.
Advocate Vikram Varma dealing with cases of foreigners who have invested in property in Goa said, “The government has misinterpreted the provisions of FEMA. I have examined the documents and find no violation of FEMA in letter or spirit.”
Joint secretary of the state government Anupam Kishore said, “There has been no misinterpretation of FEMA and action has been initiated against foreign nationals who have contravened FEMA regulations. They also have a right to defend themselves. Most of them have given an affidavit before sub-registrars’ that they were residents in India, which was false.”
January 8, 2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Britons get ED notice on Goa property
Britons get ED notice on Goa property
Asked To Explain Why Govt Should Not Confiscate It
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: Acting against foreigners “illegally” purchasing property in Goa, the Enforcement Directorate has slapped show a cause notice on two British nationals seeking to know why their property in Corona, North Goa, should not be confiscated.
The notice was based on a complaint filed by the assistant director of DoE under section 16 (3) of FEMA as the duo had failed to establish their status as “persons resident in India” and yet had purchased and sold property in India without obtaining RBI permission.
The notice, issued by K Nageshwar Rao, special director, DoE, on December 11, 2008, asks “why the property which is involved in the contravention of the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act (1999) should not be confiscated to the Central government account”.
This is the first time a foreign national who had “illegally” invested in property in Goa has been issued a show cause notice for confiscation of the property by the ED. The state government has sent a list of 482 transactions by foreigners for the ED to investigate.
TOI had reported in June that the ED had come across reports that foreigners have purchased properties in excess of 100-acres in Goa and that of the 400 cases of FEMA violations in Goa referred to RBI, 74 had been forwarded to the ED. Earlier in May, the ED had served notices to foreigners asking them to appear for hearings.
In his complaint, the ED assistant director said he had received information from RBI about the purchase of immovable and agricultural property by foreign nationals, Nicholas Joseph Papa and his friend Michael Dennis Cooper, who “on tourist visa had purchased immovable properties in Goa in contravention of FEMA regulations”.
The complaint states that Nicholas declared that he had stayed in India for a period of more than 182 days, had residential permit visas and funds from abroad to purchase an old house of about 1,125 sq m in 2001 at Aldona, which he sold in 2006. In September 2006, he purchased another property of 928 sq m at Corona. “He had not taken RBI permission to purchase and sell the said properties,” the complaint notes. The value of the land is estimated at Rs 77, 25,000.
The complaint also notes that documents forwarded by the Britishers, including authenticated copies of their passports, visas, certificate of registration, residential permits describe the duo as “retired” and the purpose of their residing in India as “holiday”. However, they had purchased agricultural land in Aldona and declared themselves as “persons resident in India” in the sale deed dated September 7, 2006.
The complaint says that the Britishers had falsely declared themselves as persons “resident in India” and so are “prohibited from the acquisition of any immovable property in the form of agriculture or plantation farm house”.
January 7, 2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Asked To Explain Why Govt Should Not Confiscate It
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: Acting against foreigners “illegally” purchasing property in Goa, the Enforcement Directorate has slapped show a cause notice on two British nationals seeking to know why their property in Corona, North Goa, should not be confiscated.
The notice was based on a complaint filed by the assistant director of DoE under section 16 (3) of FEMA as the duo had failed to establish their status as “persons resident in India” and yet had purchased and sold property in India without obtaining RBI permission.
The notice, issued by K Nageshwar Rao, special director, DoE, on December 11, 2008, asks “why the property which is involved in the contravention of the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act (1999) should not be confiscated to the Central government account”.
This is the first time a foreign national who had “illegally” invested in property in Goa has been issued a show cause notice for confiscation of the property by the ED. The state government has sent a list of 482 transactions by foreigners for the ED to investigate.
TOI had reported in June that the ED had come across reports that foreigners have purchased properties in excess of 100-acres in Goa and that of the 400 cases of FEMA violations in Goa referred to RBI, 74 had been forwarded to the ED. Earlier in May, the ED had served notices to foreigners asking them to appear for hearings.
In his complaint, the ED assistant director said he had received information from RBI about the purchase of immovable and agricultural property by foreign nationals, Nicholas Joseph Papa and his friend Michael Dennis Cooper, who “on tourist visa had purchased immovable properties in Goa in contravention of FEMA regulations”.
The complaint states that Nicholas declared that he had stayed in India for a period of more than 182 days, had residential permit visas and funds from abroad to purchase an old house of about 1,125 sq m in 2001 at Aldona, which he sold in 2006. In September 2006, he purchased another property of 928 sq m at Corona. “He had not taken RBI permission to purchase and sell the said properties,” the complaint notes. The value of the land is estimated at Rs 77, 25,000.
The complaint also notes that documents forwarded by the Britishers, including authenticated copies of their passports, visas, certificate of registration, residential permits describe the duo as “retired” and the purpose of their residing in India as “holiday”. However, they had purchased agricultural land in Aldona and declared themselves as “persons resident in India” in the sale deed dated September 7, 2006.
The complaint says that the Britishers had falsely declared themselves as persons “resident in India” and so are “prohibited from the acquisition of any immovable property in the form of agriculture or plantation farm house”.
January 7, 2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
