‘Kids not given chance to reform’
Panaji: Apna Ghar was started to ensure development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles, however, past inquiries have revealed complaints of abuse by inmates.
Snehlata Bhatikar, a member of the juvenile justice board said, “The approach towards children at Apna Ghar is punitive, as if they are in prison. They are treated like thieves and never given an opportunity to improve. The staff often beat the children, misbehave with them and use abusive language, due to which children turn aggressive, beat up others or create a ruckus.”
An inquiry conducted by the JJB in 2007 on a previous complaint of assault by fellow mates at Apna Ghar, revealed that the juvenile was “sodomized by an inmate of the observation home and subjected to oral sex by other inmates”.
The report also stated that “the safety of the child has not been looked into inspite of his repeated complaints about the abuse to the staff of observation home”. Says Bhatikar, “At present kids abuse others at Apna Ghar and if this continues it won’t be long before we hear of juvenile delinquents killing others, or committing suicide. In the last few months several children either escaped from the home or were sent to IPHB for treatment. This needs to be investigated as it defeats the purpose of having a state run home to protect and correct children.”
Women and Child director Sanjiv Gadkar, however, pleads ignorance of such incidents at Apna Ghar. He said, “I have not received any report of any assault by any child at Apna Ghar.”
Staff of Apna Ghar too have been accused of abusing minors. Recently, Children’s Rights in Goa, an NGO working with children in the state moved an application for a magisterial inquiry before the JJB.
The complaint says that during their visit to Apna Ghar on October 4, 2008, they were informed that one of the inmates was admitted at the Institute of Psychiatry and Human Behaviour, Bambolim after being assaulted.
“On probing the incident it was revealed that two juveniles were assaulted by the care taker of Apna Ghar with a cricket stump. One was hit on the head and his hands and sustained grievous injuries,” says the complaint.
The NGO’s application states that this happened because the juveniles insisted they wanted to watch TV. So far, no order has been passed.
January 12,2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Monday, January 12, 2009
Inmates’ safety an issue at Apna Ghar
Inmates’ safety an issue at Apna Ghar
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: The minor Assamese boy who ran away from Apna Ghar last week claimed he was “assaulted” at the observation home. He is not the first to make such an allegation, and past inquiries have found evidence to confirm such complaints.
The boy had been sent to Apna Ghar for criminal trespass at the naval premises in Bogda, Vasco and intent to commit a criminal offence. The bail application filed by before the juvenile justice board (JJB) on Friday after his rearrest, at the Vasco railway station, states that he was “assaulted” at Apna Ghar. The principal magistrate orally instructed the Apna Ghar staff to ensure that the boy was “given protection”.
Apna Ghar was established with the objective of providing care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles, and for the adjudication of matters relating to children in conflict with the law, but it seems that the goal has not been achieved. ‘Kids not given chance to reform’
Panaji: Apna Ghar was started to ensure development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles, however, past inquiries have revealed complaints of abuse by inmates.
Snehlata Bhatikar, a member of the juvenile justice board said, “The approach towards children at Apna Ghar is punitive, as if they are in prison. They are treated like thieves and never given an opportunity to improve. The staff often beat the children, misbehave with them and use abusive language, due to which children turn aggressive, beat up others or create a ruckus.”
An inquiry conducted by the JJB in 2007 on a previous complaint of assault by fellow mates at Apna Ghar, revealed that the juvenile was “sodomized by an inmate of the observation home and subjected to oral sex by other inmates”.
The report also stated that “the safety of the child has not been looked into inspite of his repeated complaints about the abuse to the staff of observation home”. Says Bhatikar, “At present kids abuse others at Apna Ghar and if this continues it won’t be long before we hear of juvenile delinquents killing others, or committing suicide. In the last few months several children either escaped from the home or were sent to IPHB for treatment. This needs to be investigated as it defeats the purpose of having a state run home to protect and correct children.”
Women and Child director Sanjiv Gadkar, however, pleads ignorance of such incidents at Apna Ghar. He said, “I have not received any report of any assault by any child at Apna Ghar.”
Staff of Apna Ghar too have been accused of abusing minors. Recently, Children’s Rights in Goa, an NGO working with children in the state moved an application for a magisterial inquiry before the JJB.
The complaint says that during their visit to Apna Ghar on October 4, 2008, they were informed that one of the inmates was admitted at the Institute of Psychiatry and Human Behaviour, Bambolim after being assaulted.
“On probing the incident it was revealed that two juveniles were assaulted by the care taker of Apna Ghar with a cricket stump. One was hit on the head and his hands and sustained grievous injuries,” says the complaint.
The NGO’s application states that this happened because the juveniles insisted they wanted to watch TV. So far, no order has been passed.
January 12,2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Preetu Nair | TNN
Panaji: The minor Assamese boy who ran away from Apna Ghar last week claimed he was “assaulted” at the observation home. He is not the first to make such an allegation, and past inquiries have found evidence to confirm such complaints.
The boy had been sent to Apna Ghar for criminal trespass at the naval premises in Bogda, Vasco and intent to commit a criminal offence. The bail application filed by before the juvenile justice board (JJB) on Friday after his rearrest, at the Vasco railway station, states that he was “assaulted” at Apna Ghar. The principal magistrate orally instructed the Apna Ghar staff to ensure that the boy was “given protection”.
Apna Ghar was established with the objective of providing care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles, and for the adjudication of matters relating to children in conflict with the law, but it seems that the goal has not been achieved. ‘Kids not given chance to reform’
Panaji: Apna Ghar was started to ensure development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles, however, past inquiries have revealed complaints of abuse by inmates.
Snehlata Bhatikar, a member of the juvenile justice board said, “The approach towards children at Apna Ghar is punitive, as if they are in prison. They are treated like thieves and never given an opportunity to improve. The staff often beat the children, misbehave with them and use abusive language, due to which children turn aggressive, beat up others or create a ruckus.”
An inquiry conducted by the JJB in 2007 on a previous complaint of assault by fellow mates at Apna Ghar, revealed that the juvenile was “sodomized by an inmate of the observation home and subjected to oral sex by other inmates”.
The report also stated that “the safety of the child has not been looked into inspite of his repeated complaints about the abuse to the staff of observation home”. Says Bhatikar, “At present kids abuse others at Apna Ghar and if this continues it won’t be long before we hear of juvenile delinquents killing others, or committing suicide. In the last few months several children either escaped from the home or were sent to IPHB for treatment. This needs to be investigated as it defeats the purpose of having a state run home to protect and correct children.”
Women and Child director Sanjiv Gadkar, however, pleads ignorance of such incidents at Apna Ghar. He said, “I have not received any report of any assault by any child at Apna Ghar.”
Staff of Apna Ghar too have been accused of abusing minors. Recently, Children’s Rights in Goa, an NGO working with children in the state moved an application for a magisterial inquiry before the JJB.
The complaint says that during their visit to Apna Ghar on October 4, 2008, they were informed that one of the inmates was admitted at the Institute of Psychiatry and Human Behaviour, Bambolim after being assaulted.
“On probing the incident it was revealed that two juveniles were assaulted by the care taker of Apna Ghar with a cricket stump. One was hit on the head and his hands and sustained grievous injuries,” says the complaint.
The NGO’s application states that this happened because the juveniles insisted they wanted to watch TV. So far, no order has been passed.
January 12,2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Fiona to visit Goa to take Scarlett’s organs
SCARLETT MURDER CASE
Fiona to visit Goa to take Scarlett’s organs
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: British teenager Scarlett Keeling’s mother Fiona Mackeown will be coming to Goa to collect her daughter’s organs.
Speaking to TOI over the phone from her home in Devon, UK, Fiona said “I will be coming back in February to collect my daughter’s organs. I hope to be in India for the anniversary of Scarlett’s death.”
Scarlett’s body had been found on February 19, 2008 at Anjuna beach, and a case of rape and murder was registered. Fiona had taken her daughter’s body to the UK for a third autopsy after two forensic autopsies at the Goa Medical College and Hospital, Bambolim. The autopsy at the coroner’s court in Devon had revealed that Scarlett’s kidneys, stomach and uterus were missing. Doctors at GMC’s forensic department had stated that the organs had been preserved for tests.
While Scarlett’s liver and pieces of her lungs were deposited in a sealed envelope by the Goa police with the children’s court, half of the uterus and slides containing tissues were collected from the Goa Medical College and Hospital by the CBI for examination. Some of the organs utilized by the Forensic Science Laboratory, Mumbai, for chemical analysis were preserved for a period of three weeks and thereafter destroyed as per the existing protocol, it being “hazardous” to preserve them.
Fiona, who was initially skeptical of returning to India as a case of negligence was filed against her before the Women and Child department, now aspires to return home with her daughter’s organs to give a decent burial to Scarlett. “The coroner won’t release Scarlett’s body until the investigations are over in India,” she said.
Meanwhile, the CBI is yet to meet Fiona to record her statement. “I haven’t spoken to the CBI yet in person but they have agreed via email to meet them in the second week of January,” she said.
January 12,2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Fiona to visit Goa to take Scarlett’s organs
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: British teenager Scarlett Keeling’s mother Fiona Mackeown will be coming to Goa to collect her daughter’s organs.
Speaking to TOI over the phone from her home in Devon, UK, Fiona said “I will be coming back in February to collect my daughter’s organs. I hope to be in India for the anniversary of Scarlett’s death.”
Scarlett’s body had been found on February 19, 2008 at Anjuna beach, and a case of rape and murder was registered. Fiona had taken her daughter’s body to the UK for a third autopsy after two forensic autopsies at the Goa Medical College and Hospital, Bambolim. The autopsy at the coroner’s court in Devon had revealed that Scarlett’s kidneys, stomach and uterus were missing. Doctors at GMC’s forensic department had stated that the organs had been preserved for tests.
While Scarlett’s liver and pieces of her lungs were deposited in a sealed envelope by the Goa police with the children’s court, half of the uterus and slides containing tissues were collected from the Goa Medical College and Hospital by the CBI for examination. Some of the organs utilized by the Forensic Science Laboratory, Mumbai, for chemical analysis were preserved for a period of three weeks and thereafter destroyed as per the existing protocol, it being “hazardous” to preserve them.
Fiona, who was initially skeptical of returning to India as a case of negligence was filed against her before the Women and Child department, now aspires to return home with her daughter’s organs to give a decent burial to Scarlett. “The coroner won’t release Scarlett’s body until the investigations are over in India,” she said.
Meanwhile, the CBI is yet to meet Fiona to record her statement. “I haven’t spoken to the CBI yet in person but they have agreed via email to meet them in the second week of January,” she said.
January 12,2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
German girl leaves India for home
German girl leaves India for home
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: The minor German girl, at the centre of a controversial rape case, left for Germany with her mother. The girl’s mother had alleged that education minister Atanasio Monserrate’s son, Rohit, had sexually abused her daughter.
Highly placed sources said the mother and daughter returned to Germany for “personal” reasons, but will return to answer queries vital for the collection of evidence in the alleged rape.
It may be recalled that on December 5, 2008, the foreigner’s registration office (FRO), Mumbai had written to the FRO, Goa asking whether the latter had any objection to an “exit permit” being issued to the girl. Since the matter was sub judice, the Goa police had replied asking the FRO, Mumbai to seek the high court’s permission.
January 12,2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: The minor German girl, at the centre of a controversial rape case, left for Germany with her mother. The girl’s mother had alleged that education minister Atanasio Monserrate’s son, Rohit, had sexually abused her daughter.
Highly placed sources said the mother and daughter returned to Germany for “personal” reasons, but will return to answer queries vital for the collection of evidence in the alleged rape.
It may be recalled that on December 5, 2008, the foreigner’s registration office (FRO), Mumbai had written to the FRO, Goa asking whether the latter had any objection to an “exit permit” being issued to the girl. Since the matter was sub judice, the Goa police had replied asking the FRO, Mumbai to seek the high court’s permission.
January 12,2009, The Times of India, Goa edition
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
