‘Plaint against Fiona has no locus standi’
Lawyer Turns Heat On Perpetrators Of Crime
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: Fiona MacKeown, mother of British teenager Scarlett Keeling who was raped and murdered at Anjuna beach, has responded to the show cause notice issued by the director of women and child development.
In her reply, MacKeown said that she wouldn’t be able to appear before the director as she is a single mother of seven minor children and that her presence in England with her children was essential for their care and safety.
The women and child department had issued a show cause notice to MacKeown upon a complaint by Utt Goenkara spokesperson Aires Rodrigues and directed her to be present on Friday. The complaint was filed against her for violation of provisions of the Children’s Act.
Fiona further stated through her lawyer, Vikram Varma, that inadequate notice was given to her to make alternative arrangements for the safety and care of her children
and asked for exemption from personal appearance.
“My client is the natural mother of the deceased Scarlett. She has exhibited her concerns and responsibilities as a parent for Scarlett Eden Keeling from her birth, during her life and even after her death far in excess of the complainant. The complainant’s attempt to display a level of concern and responsibility higher than my client for Scarlett is unnatural, unfounded and misguiding,” reads the response to the director’s notice.
It further states that Keeling was a victim of homicide and it would be in the interest of the perpetrators of the crime to use both threat and legal muscle in browbeating Fiona from not returning to India to assist in investigations.
“The case is in appeal in the high court and the matter is being examined for its tenability. The complaint needs to be dismissed as it has no locus standi on the matter and is not substantiated by a single shred of evidence,” added Varma.
Meanwhile, the director has adjourned the matter to Thursday, September 18.
September 13, 2008, The Times of India, Goa edition
Showing posts with label Scarlett Keeling Case. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Scarlett Keeling Case. Show all posts
Saturday, September 13, 2008
Fiona’s counsel to contest plaint in Scarlett case
Fiona’s counsel to contest plaint in Scarlett case
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: The Director of Child and Women D eve l o p - ment, Sanjiv Gadkar, will on Friday hear the complaint filed by Utt G o e n k a r a spokesman Aires Rodrigues against British teenager Scarlett Keeling’s mother, Fiona Mackeown, for violating the provisions of the Children’s Act.
Gadkar has directed Fiona to remain present before him to show cause as to why action should not be taken against her under the Children’s Act.
Rodrigues had in his complaint stated that Scarlett had come to India with her mother Fiona who left the minor girl in the company of one ‘Julio’ with the intention that the said ‘Julio’ would take care of the girl by giving her food, shelter, money, etc, while the mother along with some male companion and her other children were away holidaying in Gokarna in Karnataka.
“We are responding to the complaint. What we find untenable is that despite this complaint being examined and subsequently dismissed by the Children’s Court, the directorate has found grounds to override the court’s order and pursue this case,” said Fiona’s counsel Vikram Varma.
He said that the complainant ‘has no locus standi and neither has he substantiated his allegations with a single shred of evidence’. “We would like to examine the evidence before responding to it. In the absence of evidence, the complaint ought to be treated as frivolous and an abuse of the process of law. To my mind this complaint needs to be dismissed,” he added.
September 12, 2008, The Times of India, Goa edition
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: The Director of Child and Women D eve l o p - ment, Sanjiv Gadkar, will on Friday hear the complaint filed by Utt G o e n k a r a spokesman Aires Rodrigues against British teenager Scarlett Keeling’s mother, Fiona Mackeown, for violating the provisions of the Children’s Act.
Gadkar has directed Fiona to remain present before him to show cause as to why action should not be taken against her under the Children’s Act.
Rodrigues had in his complaint stated that Scarlett had come to India with her mother Fiona who left the minor girl in the company of one ‘Julio’ with the intention that the said ‘Julio’ would take care of the girl by giving her food, shelter, money, etc, while the mother along with some male companion and her other children were away holidaying in Gokarna in Karnataka.
“We are responding to the complaint. What we find untenable is that despite this complaint being examined and subsequently dismissed by the Children’s Court, the directorate has found grounds to override the court’s order and pursue this case,” said Fiona’s counsel Vikram Varma.
He said that the complainant ‘has no locus standi and neither has he substantiated his allegations with a single shred of evidence’. “We would like to examine the evidence before responding to it. In the absence of evidence, the complaint ought to be treated as frivolous and an abuse of the process of law. To my mind this complaint needs to be dismissed,” he added.
September 12, 2008, The Times of India, Goa edition
WCD chief summons Fiona
WCD chief summons Fiona
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: The director of the Wo m e n and Child d e p a r t - ment, Goa has issued a notice to S c a rl e t t Keeling’s m o t h e r. The director has directed Fiona Mackeown to remain present before him on September 12, 2008, and to show cause why action shouldn’t be taken against her for violation of the provisions of the Goa Children’s Act, 2005.
This notice was issued by WCD director Sanjiv Gadkar on September 2, based on a complaint received from Utt Goenkara spokesman Aires Rodrigues alleging that Fiona has “committed certain acts which constitute an offence under section 8 (1) (2) and (12) of the Goa Children’s Act, 2003.
Gadkar added, “I am satisfied that there exists a prima facie case for enquiring into the said instance of violation of the provisions of the Goa Children’s Act, 2003 by Fiona”. Rodrigues had alleged that Fiona was fully aware that her daughter Scarlett was a minor and yet left her in the company of Julio to take care of the girl by giving her food, shelter and money. “The law mandates that all children within the state of Goa be provided a safe environment wherein parents are responsible to ensure that the child is not abused,” alleged Rodrigues.
Confirming that he had received the notice, Fiona’s counsel Vikram Varma said that his client would respond to the notice. “It would be unprecedented for the government to start a parallel hearing in a matter which is already being heard by the high court of Bombay at Goa.”
Varma further added, “Such an action is ultravires and could be interpreted as contempt, unless initiated with leave or orders from the high court. Perhaps the director was not informed that the proceedings in this matter are being heard in the high court. I am examining the matter and my client would respond to the notice.”
September 6, 2008, The Times of India, Goa edition
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: The director of the Wo m e n and Child d e p a r t - ment, Goa has issued a notice to S c a rl e t t Keeling’s m o t h e r. The director has directed Fiona Mackeown to remain present before him on September 12, 2008, and to show cause why action shouldn’t be taken against her for violation of the provisions of the Goa Children’s Act, 2005.
This notice was issued by WCD director Sanjiv Gadkar on September 2, based on a complaint received from Utt Goenkara spokesman Aires Rodrigues alleging that Fiona has “committed certain acts which constitute an offence under section 8 (1) (2) and (12) of the Goa Children’s Act, 2003.
Gadkar added, “I am satisfied that there exists a prima facie case for enquiring into the said instance of violation of the provisions of the Goa Children’s Act, 2003 by Fiona”. Rodrigues had alleged that Fiona was fully aware that her daughter Scarlett was a minor and yet left her in the company of Julio to take care of the girl by giving her food, shelter and money. “The law mandates that all children within the state of Goa be provided a safe environment wherein parents are responsible to ensure that the child is not abused,” alleged Rodrigues.
Confirming that he had received the notice, Fiona’s counsel Vikram Varma said that his client would respond to the notice. “It would be unprecedented for the government to start a parallel hearing in a matter which is already being heard by the high court of Bombay at Goa.”
Varma further added, “Such an action is ultravires and could be interpreted as contempt, unless initiated with leave or orders from the high court. Perhaps the director was not informed that the proceedings in this matter are being heard in the high court. I am examining the matter and my client would respond to the notice.”
September 6, 2008, The Times of India, Goa edition
Wednesday, June 25, 2008
Scarlett Keeling Case;Julio fears arrest, files anticipatory bail plea
SCARLETT KEELING CASE
Julio fears arrest, files anticipatory bail plea
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: British teenager Scarlett Keeling’s friend in India, Julio Lobo, a resident of Siolim, has filed an anticipatory bail application before the children’s court on Monday fearing his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
Julio in his application said that he fears that he would be falsely implicated in the case.
The CBI officials who are presently in Goa to investigate the rape and murder of the British teenager had interrogated Julio on June 20.
Julio in his bail application has alleged that the officials who searched his house on Saturday took away his aunt’s torch stating that he had used the torch when he was on the beach near
Lui’s shack - in front of which Scarlett’s body was found - inspite of him insisting that he never went in search of the deceased teenager.
He has also said in his bail application that at present the CBI officers have for the first time taken on a new attack against him by claiming that he was on the Anjuna beach on the early morning of February 18, 2008 - the day on which Scarlett was found dead - with a torch and as such had met the girl around the time at which she died.
A notice has subsequently been served to the CBI and the matter will be heard on June 27, 2008.
Besides, another of the accused in the case, Placido Carvalho alias Shana Boy, has also made an application before the children’s court stating that a passport size photo of his seized by the CBI should he returned to him or that the investigating agency should be directed not to make, maintain or distribute any copies of the said photograph.
The matter will be heard on July 4, 2008.
June 24, 2008, The Times of India, Goa edition
Julio fears arrest, files anticipatory bail plea
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
Panaji: British teenager Scarlett Keeling’s friend in India, Julio Lobo, a resident of Siolim, has filed an anticipatory bail application before the children’s court on Monday fearing his arrest by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
Julio in his application said that he fears that he would be falsely implicated in the case.
The CBI officials who are presently in Goa to investigate the rape and murder of the British teenager had interrogated Julio on June 20.
Julio in his bail application has alleged that the officials who searched his house on Saturday took away his aunt’s torch stating that he had used the torch when he was on the beach near
Lui’s shack - in front of which Scarlett’s body was found - inspite of him insisting that he never went in search of the deceased teenager.
He has also said in his bail application that at present the CBI officers have for the first time taken on a new attack against him by claiming that he was on the Anjuna beach on the early morning of February 18, 2008 - the day on which Scarlett was found dead - with a torch and as such had met the girl around the time at which she died.
A notice has subsequently been served to the CBI and the matter will be heard on June 27, 2008.
Besides, another of the accused in the case, Placido Carvalho alias Shana Boy, has also made an application before the children’s court stating that a passport size photo of his seized by the CBI should he returned to him or that the investigating agency should be directed not to make, maintain or distribute any copies of the said photograph.
The matter will be heard on July 4, 2008.
June 24, 2008, The Times of India, Goa edition
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Posts
